<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to do P2P</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.proceranetworks.com/2010/02/23/how-not-to-do-p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.proceranetworks.com/2010/02/23/how-not-to-do-p2p/</link>
	<description>Procera Network&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:50:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://blog.proceranetworks.com/2010/02/23/how-not-to-do-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.proceranetworks.com/?p=81#comment-25</guid>
		<description>P4P technology reduces the bandwidth strain on the core of the Internet, but it does nothing to reduce jitter and bandwidth hogging via the TCP multi-flow exploit.  BitTorrent looked into using more evenly spaced packets to reduce jitter, but they determined that being polite and less aggressive resulted in BT ceding capacity to other applications and getting less performance.  So BitTorrent chose to be selfish rather than polite.

http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/01/bittorrent-would-rather-be-selfish-than-friendly/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P4P technology reduces the bandwidth strain on the core of the Internet, but it does nothing to reduce jitter and bandwidth hogging via the TCP multi-flow exploit.  BitTorrent looked into using more evenly spaced packets to reduce jitter, but they determined that being polite and less aggressive resulted in BT ceding capacity to other applications and getting less performance.  So BitTorrent chose to be selfish rather than polite.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/01/bittorrent-would-rather-be-selfish-than-friendly/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/01/bittorrent-would-rather-be-selfish-than-friendly/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
